Home

Training Opportunities

Info for Animal Control & Field Officers

Info for District Attorneys & Judges

Model Ordinances

Humane Euthanasia

Link Between Animal Cruelty & Human Violence

Improving Shelter Operations

Useful Forms And Handouts

--------------

Classifieds:

Jobs

Equipment

Animals

 

In an increasingly proactive legal system that recognizes the emotional bond between animals and their human families, several states have recently allowed claims and/or judgements, or have considered legislation for emotional distress to owners in animal cruelty cases. Some examples are: Oregon, News-Times


Waldport attorney wins award in pet poisoning case

Wednesday September 18, 2002

Waldport attorney Scott Beckstead announced this week that he won an award of more than $135,000 from a Curry County jury on Sept. 12 in a case alleging emotional harm from the poisoning of four pet dogs.
Beckstead tried the case in front of a jury with support and assistance from Brookings attorney Kim Olin.
The plaintiffs, Joe Ingwerson, Delores Ingwerson, and their daughter, Sarah Ege, all of Brookings, alleged that a neighbor, Jerry Whitman, intentionally fatally poisoned their four dogs. The lawsuit sought damages for the emotional distress suffered by the family as they watched their animals die from poisoning by slug bait and antifreeze. The lawsuit also sought an award for the dogs' value and the veterinary bills incurred.
The evidence at trial showed that shortly after moving into the house across the street from the Ingwerson family in May 1995, Whitman began complaining about the dogs. In October 1995, two of the family dogs, a 1-year-old-Schipperke and an 11-year-old springer spaniel, were poisoned with antifreeze and had to be euthanized.
According to Beckstead, in the years that followed, Whitman continued to exhibit hostility toward the Ingwerson family and their dogs. According to an eyewitness who testified in the trial, Whitman was seen standing at the Ingwersons' gate with a small box under his arm, with "Jack," the family's border collie, on the other side.
The next day, Jack died of slug bait poisoning. About two weeks later, a fourth dog, "Chewy," died of antifreeze poisoning.
Whitman died of long-standing health problems in March of this year. Prior to his death, when questioned by Beckstead in the deposition, Whitman denied killing the dogs.
After Whitman's death, the lawsuit was converted into an action against his estate, with his wife, Audrey Whitman, serving as personal representative. The estate was represented at trial by Coos Bay attorney Nathan McClintock.
After both sides presented their evidence, the judge ruled that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to allow the jury to award damages for the deaths of the first two dogs. He also ruled, however, that the jury could consider the earlier poisonings as evidence that Whitman killed the second two dogs.
The jury awarded conversion damages of $35,662 for the death of Jack, and emotional distress damages of $50,000 each for Jack and Chewy.
"The evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff loved their dogs dearly and considered them part of the family," Beckstead said. "The jury's verdict reflects the belief among ordinary people that losing an animal you love is very different from losing ordinary personal property."
Beckstead said that to his knowledge, this verdict is the largest of its kind in Oregon history. "As far as I know, no jury in Oregon has ever awarded damages this large for emotional harm resulting from the intentional killing of a companion animal," he said.

Wednesday, June 25, 2003
from today's NY Law Journal

Woman Recovers Damages for Loss of Dog

A Long Island woman whose Yorkshire terrier died after a groomer placed it in a hot dryer after bathing is entitled to damages that account for the companionship the dog provided, a judge has ruled. In Mercurio v. Weber, SC1113-03, Nassau County District Court Judge Scott Fairgrieve determined that Debra Mercurio, who bought the dog after she lost her husband in the Sept. 11 attacks, could recover $2,095 from All Paws Pet & Grooming Mobile, which admitted negligence.
The judge reasoned that even though Dexter "was not an animal who possessed many useful skills," part of his value was his company. The "chief purpose" of dogs, the judge concluded, is the companionship they afford, as opposed to any services they provide. Ms. Mercurio, who brought the suit pro se, was paid $1,513 to replace Dexter, a price the judge said "encompasses the loss of companionship." Bentley, another of Ms. Mercurio's Yorkies, was burned in the dryer, too, but he
survived. The award included the $582 she spent on veterinary services to treat both dogs' burns. Farrah, a third Yorkie, was not injured by the dryer.


Lawsuits May Be Allowed When Pets Are Abused

February 11, 2003
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=573&ncid=757&e=1&u=/nm/20030211/od_nm/pets_dc

DENVER (Reuters) - People who abuse cats and dogs could find themselves in serious legal trouble if a bill passes in Colorado that would allow pet owners to sue for up to $100,000 for "loss of companionship," the measure's sponsor says.
"I want to hold people responsible who are intentionally cruel to animals," state Rep. Mark Cloer said Monday.
Cats and dogs are now considered "property" and with most not worth more than $50, it makes no sense to sue someone who tortures or kills a pet, the Republican lawmaker from Colorado Springs said.
Local media said the companionship measure would be the first of its kind in the country. Colorado already is one of 14 states that allow pets to "inherit" from their owners.


Lawsuit filed on dog's behalf
Dayton Daily News

SPRINGFIELD | The Dayton-based Center for Animal Law and Advocacy has filed a civil lawsuit on behalf of Sadie, the 2-year-old mixed breed dog beaten and burned by her owner.
The animal-rights organization sued Bryon F. Maggard on Tuesday for intentional assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The group is seeking in excess of $25,000 in damages to pay for Sadie's housing, medical bills and future medical and psychological needs. The suit also seeks money damages for the dog's pain and suffering and emotional distress.
Maggard, 19, is in the county jail after he pleaded guilty. He was sentenced May 2 to serve 30 days and ordered to get anger and alcohol counseling. He also must pay about $2,000 in fines and restitution. He lived in South Vienna at the time of the incident. He now lists Tennessee as his home.
Maggard admitted to beating Sadie with a skillet, trying to hang her with electrical cord and setting her on fire on St. Patrick's Day, according to court records. A family member found the dog hiding in the back yard. She is to be adopted today.
Paul R. Leonard, legal counsel and interim director of the Center for Animal Law and Advocacy, said the suit is the first in the state in which an advocacy group is suing on behalf of an animal.